Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst. -0001; 17(2): 82-90
Published online November 30, -0001
https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.2.82
© The Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
Joo-Sung Kim1, and Jung Sik Jeong2
1Kyeong-In VTS Center, Ministry of Public Safety and Security, Incheon, Korea, 2Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo, Korea
Correspondence to :
Jung Sik Jeong (jsjeong@mmu.ac.kr)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Vessel Traffic Services operators have kept sharp monitoring and provided the appropriate information to ensure safe and effective navigation. While attending the tasks, analysis of traffic patterns and navigational data is required to conduct accurate situation assessment in decision-making process of VTS operators (VTSO). Unfortunately, there are problems in the process of data analysis such as appropriateness of time, VTSO’s personal error and improper judgment. Therefore, objective and proper data analysis is necessary to solve above matters. However, it is virtually impossible to monitor all vessels because there are many vessels in the VTS area and at the same time complex traffic situations are produced. In this study, we proposed a machine learning algorithms for objective and accurate pattern recognition and data modeling. Support Vector Regression algorithm was used for data learning and modeling. The optimal parameters were selected through
Keywords: Vessel Traffic Services, Machine learning, Sea traffic route, Decision making, Pattern recognition
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
E-mail: jskim81@korea.kr
E-mail: jsjeong@mmu.ac.kr
Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst. -0001; 17(2): 82-90
Published online November 30, -0001 https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.2.82
Copyright © The Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems.
Joo-Sung Kim1, and Jung Sik Jeong2
1Kyeong-In VTS Center, Ministry of Public Safety and Security, Incheon, Korea, 2Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo, Korea
Correspondence to:Jung Sik Jeong (jsjeong@mmu.ac.kr)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Vessel Traffic Services operators have kept sharp monitoring and provided the appropriate information to ensure safe and effective navigation. While attending the tasks, analysis of traffic patterns and navigational data is required to conduct accurate situation assessment in decision-making process of VTS operators (VTSO). Unfortunately, there are problems in the process of data analysis such as appropriateness of time, VTSO’s personal error and improper judgment. Therefore, objective and proper data analysis is necessary to solve above matters. However, it is virtually impossible to monitor all vessels because there are many vessels in the VTS area and at the same time complex traffic situations are produced. In this study, we proposed a machine learning algorithms for objective and accurate pattern recognition and data modeling. Support Vector Regression algorithm was used for data learning and modeling. The optimal parameters were selected through
Keywords: Vessel Traffic Services, Machine learning, Sea traffic route, Decision making, Pattern recognition
Lost function.
Simulation dataset and data division.
Data learning on sub-dataset.
Extracted model of sub-dataset.
Extracted route model of whole data-set.
Deviation comparison.
Comparison of course differences.
Comparison of speed changes.
Relationship between deviation and course differences.
Relationship between deviation and speed changes.
Ezreen Farina Shair, Radhi Hafizuddin Razali, Abdul Rahim Abdullah, and Nurul Fauzani Jamaluddin
International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems 2022; 22(1): 11-22 https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2022.22.1.11Joo-Sung Kim, Jin-Suk Lee, and Kwang-Il Kim
International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems 2019; 19(1): 18-27 https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2019.19.1.18Joo-Sung Kim
Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst. 2017; 17(4): 279-288 https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.4.279Lost function.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Simulation dataset and data division.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Data learning on sub-dataset.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Extracted model of sub-dataset.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Extracted route model of whole data-set.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Deviation comparison.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Comparison of course differences.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Comparison of speed changes.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Relationship between deviation and course differences.
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Relationship between deviation and speed changes.