Article Search
닫기

Original Article

Split Viewer

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems 2023; 23(3): 303-310

Published online September 25, 2023

https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2023.23.3.303

© The Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems

Four Types of Generalized Fuzzy Continuous Mappings

Yeon Seok Eom , Sang Min Yun , and Seok Jong Lee

Department of Mathematics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea

Correspondence to :
Seok Jong Lee (sjl@cbnu.ac.kr)

Received: June 29, 2023; Accepted: August 4, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

We introduce four types of continuity namely, the concepts of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, and generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute mappings based on the notion of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets. We analyzed the properties of these mappings and examined the relationships among these continuities.

Keywords: Generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, Generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute.

The concept of fuzzy sets was introduced by Zadeh [1]. Chang [2] defined fuzzy topological spaces and several authors have since studied and generalized this concept. One such generalization was introduced by Sostak [3], who used the concept of degree of openness. This type of generalization was rephrased by Chattopadhyay et al. [4] and Ramadan [5].

As a further generalization of fuzzy sets, Atanassov [6] introduced the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Coker [7] defined the intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces using these sets. Building on the ideas of the degrees of openness and non-openness, Coker and Demirci [8] defined intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense as a generalization of smooth topological spaces and intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. Kim and Lee [9] introduced the concept of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets for intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense. They also investigated several properties of these sets.

Based on Levine’s concept of a generalized closed set in topological spaces [10], the concept of generalized fuzzy continuous mappings in fuzzy topological spaces was introduced by Balasubramanian and Sundaram [11]. Subsequently, El-Shafei and Zakari [12] introduced the concept of semi-generalized continuous mapping of Chang’s fuzzy topological spaces.

In this paper, we introduce four types of continuity, namely, the concepts of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semi-continuous, and generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute mappings, based on the notion of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets proposed by Kim and Lee [9]. We analyze the properties of these mappings and examine the relationships among these continuities.

For the nonstandard definitions and notation, we refer to [9, 1317]. Let I(X) be a family of all intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X and II be the set of the pair (r, s) such that r, sI and r + s ≤ 1.

Definition 2.1 ([8])

Let X be a nonempty set. intuitionistic fuzzy topology in Sostak’s sense (SoIFT), on X is the mapping that satisfies the following properties:

  • (1) and .

  • (2) and .

  • (3) and .

is said to be an intuitionistic fuzzy topological space in Sostak’s sense (SoIFTS). Also, we call a gradation of openness of A and a gradation of nonopenness of A.

Definition 2.2 ([13])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be

  • (1) fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen if there is a fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in X such that BA ⊆ cl(B, r, s),

  • (2) fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed if there is a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in X such that int(B, r, s) ⊆ AB.

Theorem 2.3 ([13])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then the following statements are equivalent.

  • (1) A is a fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen set.

  • (2) Ac is a fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed set.

  • (3) cl(int(A, r, s), r, s) ⊇ A.

  • (4) int(cl(Ac, r, s), r, s) ⊆ Ac.

Definition 2.4 ([13, 15])

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTSX for SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then f is termed

  • (1) a fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping if f1(B) is a fuzzy (r, s)-open set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y,

  • (2) a fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mapping if f1(B) is a fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Definition 2.5 ([9])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed if cl(A, r, s) ⊆ B when AB and B is fuzzy (r, s)-open. The complement of a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set is termed generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open.

Definition 2.6 ([9])

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS. For each (r, s) ∈ II and for each AI(X), the generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closure is defined as

gcl(A,r,s)={BI(X)AB,Bis generalized fuzzy (r,s)-closed}.

Definition 2.7 ([9])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed if scl(A, r, s) ⊆ B whenever AB and B is fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen. The complement of a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set is termed semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open.

Definition 2.8 ([9])

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS. For each (r, s) ∈ II and for each AI(X), the semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closure is defined by

sgcl(A,r,s)={BI(X)AB,Bis semi-generalized fuzzy (r,s)-closed}.

Definition 2.9 ([9])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed if scl(A, r, s) ⊆ B whenever AB and B is fuzzy (r, s)open. The complement of a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed set is termed generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen.

Definition 2.10 ([9])

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS. For each (r, s) ∈ II and for each AI(X), the generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosure is defined as

gscl(A,r,s)={BI(X)AB,Bis generalized fuzzy (r,s)-semiclosed}.

Definition 2.11 ([11])

Let be a mapping from a fuzzy topological space X to a fuzzy topological space Y. Then, f is termed a generalized fuzzy continuous mapping if f1(η) is a generalized fuzzy closed set in X for each fuzzy closed set η in Y.

Based on the notion of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets proposed by Kim and Lee [9], we define the generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mappings on intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense and establish certain of their properties.

Definition 3.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is termed a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-closed set. B in Y.

Remark 3.2

It is clear that every fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous. However, the following example shows that the converse need not be true.

Example 3.3

Let X = {x, y, z}, Y = {a, b} and let A1 and A2 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X and Y, respectively, defined as

A(x)=(0.5,0.1),A1(y)=(0.1,0.5),A1(z)=(0.1,0.5);

and

A2(a)=(0.1,0.5),A2(b)=(0.5,0.1).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X and Y. respectively. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = f(z) = b, f(y) = a. Since f1(A2) is not fuzzy (12,13)-open in X. f is not fuzzy (12,13)-continuous. Note that f-1(A2c)(x)=(0.1,0.5),f-1(A2c)(y)=(0.5,0.1),f-1(A2c)(z)=(0.1,0.5). Thus, the only fuzzy (12,13)-open set in X that contains f-1(A2c) is 1, hence, cl(f-1(A2c),12,13)1_. Therefore, f-1(A2c) is a generalized fuzzy (12,13)-colsed set in X. Hence, f is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous.

Theorem 3.4

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous if and only if f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-open set in Y. Thus, Bc is a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, f1(Bc) = f1(B)c is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Thus, f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X.

Conversely, let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Then Bc is fuzzy (r, s)-open in Y. By assumption, f1(Bc) = f1(B)c is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X. Thus, f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Hence f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Theorem 3.5

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then f(gcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s), where A is any intuitionistic fuzzy set in X.

Proof

Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous and the set cl(f(A), r, s) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. f1(cl(f(A), r, s)) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Also, we have Af1(cl(f(A), r, s)), and hence,

gcl(A,r,s)f-1(cl(f(A),r,s)).

Thus, f(gcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s).

The following example shows that the converse of Theorem 3.5 need not be true.

Example 3.6

Let X = {x, y, z} and let A1 be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in X defined as

A1(x)=(0.4,0.3),A1(y)=(0.3,0.4),A1(z)=(0.4,0.3).

We define by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, is a SoIFT on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = y, f(y) = x, f(z) = z. Since cl(f(A1),12,13)=1_, we have g(gcl(A1,12,13))cl(f(A1),12,13). However, we note that f-1(A1c)(x)=(0.4,0.3),f-1(A1c)(y)=(0.3,0.4) and f-1(A1c)(z)=(0.3,0.4). So, f-1(A1c)A1, and A1 is a fuzzy (12,13)-open set in X. But cl(f-1(A2c),12,13)=1_A1. Thus, f-1(A1c) is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-colsed in (X, T). Therefore, f is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous.

Levine [10] introduced T12space, in which every generalized closed set is closed. The property of T12 lies strictly between T1 and T0. We provide a similar definition of intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces as follows:

Definition 3.7

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, ( ) is said to be fuzzy(r,s)-T12. if every generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X.

Theorem 3.8

Let and be mappings, Y be fuzzy(r,s)-T12, and (r, s) ∈ II. If f and g are generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Z. Then g1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. Since Y is fuzzy (r,s)-T12, g1(B) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. Thus (gf) 1(B) = f1(g1(B)) is: a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X. Hence gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous. The following example demonstrates that Theorem 3.8 is invalid. if Y is not fuzzy (r,s)-T12.

Example 3.9

Let X = {x, y, z} and let A1, A2, A3, and A4 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(1,0),A1(y)=(1,0),A1(z)=(0,1);A2(x)=(0,1),A2(y)=(1,0),A2(z)=(1,0);A3(x)=(1,0),A3(y)=(0,1),A3(z)=(0,1);

and

A4(x)=(1,0),A4(y)=(0,1),A4(z)=(1,0).

Define and by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise.U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,A3,(0,1),otherwise;

and

S(A)=(S1(A),S2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A4,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, , and are SoIFTs on X. Moreover, ( ) is not fuzzy (12,13)-T12. Define as f(x) = f(z) = z, f (y) = y and let be the identity mapping. Thus, it is easy to see that f and g are generalized fuzzy(12,13)-continuous. However, gf is not. generalized fuzzy(12,13)-continuous because (gf)-1(A4c)=f-1(g-1(A4c))=f-1(A4c) is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ).

Definition 4.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is termed a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping if f1(B) is a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in Y.

Theorem 4.2

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, then f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Straightforward.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 4.3

Let X = {x, y} and let A1 and A2 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(0,1),A1(y)=(0.4,0.4);

and

A2(x)=(0,1),A2(y)=(0.6,0.2).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = x, f(y) = y. Then it is easy to see that f is semi-generalized fuzzy (12,13)continuous. But f is not fuzzy(12,13)-semi continuous because f1(A2) = A2 is not fuzzy (12,13)-semiopen in ( ).

Theorem 4.4

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous if and only if f1(B) is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set, B in Y.

Proof

Straightforward.

Theorem 4.5

Let be a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then the following statements hold:

  • (1) f(sgcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set A in X.

  • (2) sgcl(f1(B), r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(B, r, s)) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set B in Y.

Proof

(1) Since cl(f(A), r, s) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y and f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, f1(cl(f(A), r, s)) is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Since Af1(cl(f(A), r, s)), we have

sgcl(A,r,s)f-1(cl(f(A),r,s)).

Therefore, f(sgcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s).

(2) Let BI(Y ) then, f1(B) ∈ I(X). From (1), we obtain

f(sgcl(f-1(B),r,s))cl(f(f-1(B)),r,s)cl(B,r,s).

Thus, sgcl(f1(B), r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(B), r, s)).

Theorem 4.6

Let and be mapping, and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous and g is fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then gf is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Straightforward.

As in Definition 3.7, we define fuzzy (r,s)-semi-T12 space as follows:

Definition 4.7

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, ( ) is said to be fuzzy(r,s)-semi-T12 if every semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set is fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed.

Theorem 4.8

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If ( ) is fuzzy,(r,s)-semi-T12, then f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous if and only if f is fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof. Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Since f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, f1(B) is Semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed. By assumption, f1(B) is fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed. Thus, f is fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

The converse follows from Theorem 4.2.

Definition 5.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is termed a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mapping if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in Y.

Theorem 5.2

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is a semi-generalized fuzzy (rs)-continuous, then f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof

It is obvious.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 5.3

Let X = {x, y} and let A1 and A2 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(0.6,0.3),A1(y)=(0,1);

and A2(x)=(0.2,0.7),A2(y)=(0,1).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = x, f(y) = y. Then f is generalized fuzzy(12,13)-semicontinuous. But f is not semi-generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous. For A2cA2c and A2c is fuzzy (12,13)-semiopen but scl (A2c,12,13)=1_A2c in ( ).

Theorem 5.4

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof

Straightforward.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 5.5

Let X = {x} and let A1, A2 and A3 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(0.1,0.8),A2(x)=(0.2,0.7),A3(x)=(0.7,0.2).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,A2(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A3,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping is defined by f(x) = x.

We consider only the non-trival fuzzy (12,13)-closed set A3c in ( ). For the only non-trivial fuzzy (12,13)-open superset A2 of A3c in ( ), we have scl (A3c,12,13)=A1cA2cA2=A2A2 . Thus, the inverse image f-1(A3c)=A3c is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-semiclosed in ( ). Hence, f is generalized fuzzy(12,13)-semi continuous.

We now consider the same fuzzy (12,13)-closedset A3c in ( ). For the fuzzy (12,13)-open superset A2 of A3c in ( ), cl (A3c,12,13)=A2cA2. Thus the inverse image f-1(A3c)=A3c is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ). Hence f is not generalized. fuzzy (12,13)-continuous.

Theorem 5.6

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous if and only if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Proof

It is obvious.

Theorem 5.7

Let be a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mapping from aSoIFTS X to aSoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Thus, the following statements hold:

  • (1) f(gscl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set A in X.

  • (2) gscl(f1(B), r, s)) ⊆ f1(cl(B, r, s)) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set B in Y.

Proof

(1) Since cl(f(A), r, s) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y and f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, f1(cl(f(A), r, s)) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed. In addition, Af1(cl(f(A), r, s)), and hence gscl(A, r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(f(A), r, s)). Thus f(gscl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s).

(2) Let BI(Y ), then f1(B) ∈ I(X). From (1), we have

f(sgcl(f-1(B),r,s))cl(f(f-1(B)),r,s)cl(B,r,s).

Hence gscl(f1(B), r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(B, r, s)).

Theorem 5.8

Let and be mapping, and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous and g is fuzzy (r, s)-continuous. Then, gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof

It is obvious.

Definition 6.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is said to be generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X for each generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in Y.

Theorem 6.2

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute if and only if f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X for each generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Proof

It is obvious.

Theorem 6.3

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute, then f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Then B is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute, f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X. Hence f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 6.4

Let X = {x, y, z} and A1, A2, and A3 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(1,0),A1(y)=(0,1),A1(z)=(0,1);A2(x)=(0,1),A2(y)=(0,1),A2(z)=(1,0);

and

A3(x)=(1,0),A3(y)=(0,1),A3(z)=(1,0).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,A2,A3,(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = x, f(y) = y, and f(z) = x. Clearly, f is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous. However, f is not generalized fuzzy(12,13)-irresolute, because A3 is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ) and f1(A3) = A3 is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ).

Theorem 6.5

Let and be mappings and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute and g is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in ( ). Since g is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, g1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in ( ). Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute, f1(g1(B)) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in ( ). Thus, gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

We introduce four types of continuity, i.e., the concepts of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, and generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute mappings and investigated several of their properties. These continuities are either strong or weak versions of the traditional continuities. The relationships among these continuities were also discussed.

  1. Zadeh, LA (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8, 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    CrossRef
  2. Chang, CL (1968). Fuzzy topological spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 24, 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90057-7
    CrossRef
  3. Sostak, AP . On a fuzzy topological structure., Proceedings of the 13th Winter School on Abstract Analysis, 1985, Srni, Czech Republic, pp.89-103.
  4. Chattopadhyay, KC, Hazra, RN, and Samanta, SK (1992). Gradation of openness: fuzzy topology. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 49, 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90329-3
    CrossRef
  5. Ramadan, AA (1992). Smooth topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 48, 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90352-5
    CrossRef
  6. Atanassov, KT (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 20, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
    CrossRef
  7. Coker, D (1997). An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 88, 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00076-0
    CrossRef
  8. Coker, D, and Demirci, M (1996). An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense. Busefal. 67, 67-76.
  9. Kim, JT, and Lee, SJ (2022). Generalized fuzzy closed sets on intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society. 35, 243-254.
  10. Nevine, L (1970). Generalized closed sets in topology. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo. 19, 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02843888
    CrossRef
  11. Balasubramanian, G, and Sundaram, P (1997). On some generalizations of fuzzy continuous functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 86, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00371-1
    CrossRef
  12. El-Shafei, ME, and Zakari, A (2007). Semi-generalized continuous mappings in fuzzy topological spaces. Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society. 15, 109-120.
  13. Lee, EP (2004). Semiopen sets on intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense. Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems. 14, 234-238.
    CrossRef
  14. Lee, SO, and Lee, EP (2005). Fuzzy (r, s)-preopen sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 5, 136-139.
    CrossRef
  15. Lee, EP, and Kim, SH (2007). Fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semicontinuous, fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semiopen and fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semiclosed mappings. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 7, 120-126.
    CrossRef
  16. Lee, SO, and Lee, EP (2006). Fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semiopen sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 6, 299-303.
    CrossRef
  17. Lee, SJ, and Kim, JT (2011). Properties of fuzzy (r, s)-semi-irresolute mappings in intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 11, 190-196. https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2011.11.3.190
    CrossRef

Yeon Seok Eom received her Ph.D. degree from Chungbuk National University. 2012. She is a lecturer at the Department of Mathematics at Chungbuk National University, since 2012. Her research interests include the general and fuzzy topologies. She is a member of KIIS and KMS.

Email: math1518@naver.com

Sang Min Yun received his Ph.D. degree from Chungbuk National University, in 2015. He is a lecturer at the Department of Mathematics at Chungbuk National University, since 2015. His research interests include the general and fuzzy topologies. He is a member of KIIS and KMS.

E-mail: jivesm@naver.com.

Seok Jong Lee received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Yonsei University in 1986. years and 1990, respectively). He is currently a professor in the Department of Mathematics at Chungbuk National University, since 1989. He was a visiting scholar at Carleton University from 1995 to 1996 and Wayne State University between 2003 and 2004. His research interests include generalresearch. topology, and fuzzy topology. He is a member of KIIS and KMS.

E-mail: sjl@cbnu.ac.kr

Article

Original Article

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems 2023; 23(3): 303-310

Published online September 25, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2023.23.3.303

Copyright © The Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems.

Four Types of Generalized Fuzzy Continuous Mappings

Yeon Seok Eom , Sang Min Yun , and Seok Jong Lee

Department of Mathematics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea

Correspondence to:Seok Jong Lee (sjl@cbnu.ac.kr)

Received: June 29, 2023; Accepted: August 4, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We introduce four types of continuity namely, the concepts of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, and generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute mappings based on the notion of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets. We analyzed the properties of these mappings and examined the relationships among these continuities.

Keywords: Generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, Generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute.

1. Introduction

The concept of fuzzy sets was introduced by Zadeh [1]. Chang [2] defined fuzzy topological spaces and several authors have since studied and generalized this concept. One such generalization was introduced by Sostak [3], who used the concept of degree of openness. This type of generalization was rephrased by Chattopadhyay et al. [4] and Ramadan [5].

As a further generalization of fuzzy sets, Atanassov [6] introduced the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Coker [7] defined the intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces using these sets. Building on the ideas of the degrees of openness and non-openness, Coker and Demirci [8] defined intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense as a generalization of smooth topological spaces and intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. Kim and Lee [9] introduced the concept of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets for intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense. They also investigated several properties of these sets.

Based on Levine’s concept of a generalized closed set in topological spaces [10], the concept of generalized fuzzy continuous mappings in fuzzy topological spaces was introduced by Balasubramanian and Sundaram [11]. Subsequently, El-Shafei and Zakari [12] introduced the concept of semi-generalized continuous mapping of Chang’s fuzzy topological spaces.

In this paper, we introduce four types of continuity, namely, the concepts of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semi-continuous, and generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute mappings, based on the notion of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets proposed by Kim and Lee [9]. We analyze the properties of these mappings and examine the relationships among these continuities.

2. Preliminaries

For the nonstandard definitions and notation, we refer to [9, 1317]. Let I(X) be a family of all intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X and II be the set of the pair (r, s) such that r, sI and r + s ≤ 1.

Definition 2.1 ([8])

Let X be a nonempty set. intuitionistic fuzzy topology in Sostak’s sense (SoIFT), on X is the mapping that satisfies the following properties:

  • (1) and .

  • (2) and .

  • (3) and .

is said to be an intuitionistic fuzzy topological space in Sostak’s sense (SoIFTS). Also, we call a gradation of openness of A and a gradation of nonopenness of A.

Definition 2.2 ([13])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be

  • (1) fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen if there is a fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in X such that BA ⊆ cl(B, r, s),

  • (2) fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed if there is a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in X such that int(B, r, s) ⊆ AB.

Theorem 2.3 ([13])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then the following statements are equivalent.

  • (1) A is a fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen set.

  • (2) Ac is a fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed set.

  • (3) cl(int(A, r, s), r, s) ⊇ A.

  • (4) int(cl(Ac, r, s), r, s) ⊆ Ac.

Definition 2.4 ([13, 15])

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTSX for SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then f is termed

  • (1) a fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping if f1(B) is a fuzzy (r, s)-open set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y,

  • (2) a fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mapping if f1(B) is a fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Definition 2.5 ([9])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed if cl(A, r, s) ⊆ B when AB and B is fuzzy (r, s)-open. The complement of a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set is termed generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open.

Definition 2.6 ([9])

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS. For each (r, s) ∈ II and for each AI(X), the generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closure is defined as

gcl(A,r,s)={BI(X)AB,Bis generalized fuzzy (r,s)-closed}.

Definition 2.7 ([9])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed if scl(A, r, s) ⊆ B whenever AB and B is fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen. The complement of a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set is termed semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open.

Definition 2.8 ([9])

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS. For each (r, s) ∈ II and for each AI(X), the semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closure is defined by

sgcl(A,r,s)={BI(X)AB,Bis semi-generalized fuzzy (r,s)-closed}.

Definition 2.9 ([9])

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a SoIFTS ( ) and (r, s) ∈ II. Then A is said to be generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed if scl(A, r, s) ⊆ B whenever AB and B is fuzzy (r, s)open. The complement of a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed set is termed generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen.

Definition 2.10 ([9])

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS. For each (r, s) ∈ II and for each AI(X), the generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosure is defined as

gscl(A,r,s)={BI(X)AB,Bis generalized fuzzy (r,s)-semiclosed}.

Definition 2.11 ([11])

Let be a mapping from a fuzzy topological space X to a fuzzy topological space Y. Then, f is termed a generalized fuzzy continuous mapping if f1(η) is a generalized fuzzy closed set in X for each fuzzy closed set η in Y.

3. Generalized Fuzzy (r, s)-Continuous Mappings

Based on the notion of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed sets proposed by Kim and Lee [9], we define the generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mappings on intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense and establish certain of their properties.

Definition 3.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is termed a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-closed set. B in Y.

Remark 3.2

It is clear that every fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous. However, the following example shows that the converse need not be true.

Example 3.3

Let X = {x, y, z}, Y = {a, b} and let A1 and A2 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X and Y, respectively, defined as

A(x)=(0.5,0.1),A1(y)=(0.1,0.5),A1(z)=(0.1,0.5);

and

A2(a)=(0.1,0.5),A2(b)=(0.5,0.1).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X and Y. respectively. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = f(z) = b, f(y) = a. Since f1(A2) is not fuzzy (12,13)-open in X. f is not fuzzy (12,13)-continuous. Note that f-1(A2c)(x)=(0.1,0.5),f-1(A2c)(y)=(0.5,0.1),f-1(A2c)(z)=(0.1,0.5). Thus, the only fuzzy (12,13)-open set in X that contains f-1(A2c) is 1, hence, cl(f-1(A2c),12,13)1_. Therefore, f-1(A2c) is a generalized fuzzy (12,13)-colsed set in X. Hence, f is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous.

Theorem 3.4

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous if and only if f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-open set in Y. Thus, Bc is a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, f1(Bc) = f1(B)c is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Thus, f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X.

Conversely, let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Then Bc is fuzzy (r, s)-open in Y. By assumption, f1(Bc) = f1(B)c is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X. Thus, f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Hence f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Theorem 3.5

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then f(gcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s), where A is any intuitionistic fuzzy set in X.

Proof

Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous and the set cl(f(A), r, s) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. f1(cl(f(A), r, s)) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Also, we have Af1(cl(f(A), r, s)), and hence,

gcl(A,r,s)f-1(cl(f(A),r,s)).

Thus, f(gcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s).

The following example shows that the converse of Theorem 3.5 need not be true.

Example 3.6

Let X = {x, y, z} and let A1 be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in X defined as

A1(x)=(0.4,0.3),A1(y)=(0.3,0.4),A1(z)=(0.4,0.3).

We define by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, is a SoIFT on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = y, f(y) = x, f(z) = z. Since cl(f(A1),12,13)=1_, we have g(gcl(A1,12,13))cl(f(A1),12,13). However, we note that f-1(A1c)(x)=(0.4,0.3),f-1(A1c)(y)=(0.3,0.4) and f-1(A1c)(z)=(0.3,0.4). So, f-1(A1c)A1, and A1 is a fuzzy (12,13)-open set in X. But cl(f-1(A2c),12,13)=1_A1. Thus, f-1(A1c) is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-colsed in (X, T). Therefore, f is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous.

Levine [10] introduced T12space, in which every generalized closed set is closed. The property of T12 lies strictly between T1 and T0. We provide a similar definition of intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces as follows:

Definition 3.7

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, ( ) is said to be fuzzy(r,s)-T12. if every generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X.

Theorem 3.8

Let and be mappings, Y be fuzzy(r,s)-T12, and (r, s) ∈ II. If f and g are generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Z. Then g1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. Since Y is fuzzy (r,s)-T12, g1(B) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. Thus (gf) 1(B) = f1(g1(B)) is: a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X. Hence gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous. The following example demonstrates that Theorem 3.8 is invalid. if Y is not fuzzy (r,s)-T12.

Example 3.9

Let X = {x, y, z} and let A1, A2, A3, and A4 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(1,0),A1(y)=(1,0),A1(z)=(0,1);A2(x)=(0,1),A2(y)=(1,0),A2(z)=(1,0);A3(x)=(1,0),A3(y)=(0,1),A3(z)=(0,1);

and

A4(x)=(1,0),A4(y)=(0,1),A4(z)=(1,0).

Define and by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise.U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,A3,(0,1),otherwise;

and

S(A)=(S1(A),S2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A4,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, , and are SoIFTs on X. Moreover, ( ) is not fuzzy (12,13)-T12. Define as f(x) = f(z) = z, f (y) = y and let be the identity mapping. Thus, it is easy to see that f and g are generalized fuzzy(12,13)-continuous. However, gf is not. generalized fuzzy(12,13)-continuous because (gf)-1(A4c)=f-1(g-1(A4c))=f-1(A4c) is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ).

4. Semi-Generalized Fuzzy (r, s)-Continuous Mappings

Definition 4.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is termed a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping if f1(B) is a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in Y.

Theorem 4.2

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, then f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Straightforward.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 4.3

Let X = {x, y} and let A1 and A2 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(0,1),A1(y)=(0.4,0.4);

and

A2(x)=(0,1),A2(y)=(0.6,0.2).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = x, f(y) = y. Then it is easy to see that f is semi-generalized fuzzy (12,13)continuous. But f is not fuzzy(12,13)-semi continuous because f1(A2) = A2 is not fuzzy (12,13)-semiopen in ( ).

Theorem 4.4

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous if and only if f1(B) is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set, B in Y.

Proof

Straightforward.

Theorem 4.5

Let be a semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then the following statements hold:

  • (1) f(sgcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set A in X.

  • (2) sgcl(f1(B), r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(B, r, s)) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set B in Y.

Proof

(1) Since cl(f(A), r, s) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y and f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, f1(cl(f(A), r, s)) is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in X. Since Af1(cl(f(A), r, s)), we have

sgcl(A,r,s)f-1(cl(f(A),r,s)).

Therefore, f(sgcl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s).

(2) Let BI(Y ) then, f1(B) ∈ I(X). From (1), we obtain

f(sgcl(f-1(B),r,s))cl(f(f-1(B)),r,s)cl(B,r,s).

Thus, sgcl(f1(B), r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(B), r, s)).

Theorem 4.6

Let and be mapping, and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous and g is fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then gf is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Straightforward.

As in Definition 3.7, we define fuzzy (r,s)-semi-T12 space as follows:

Definition 4.7

Let ( ) be a SoIFTS and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, ( ) is said to be fuzzy(r,s)-semi-T12 if every semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set is fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed.

Theorem 4.8

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If ( ) is fuzzy,(r,s)-semi-T12, then f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous if and only if f is fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof. Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Since f is semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, f1(B) is Semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed. By assumption, f1(B) is fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed. Thus, f is fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

The converse follows from Theorem 4.2.

5. Generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mappings

Definition 5.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is termed a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mapping if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in Y.

Theorem 5.2

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is a semi-generalized fuzzy (rs)-continuous, then f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof

It is obvious.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 5.3

Let X = {x, y} and let A1 and A2 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(0.6,0.3),A1(y)=(0,1);

and A2(x)=(0.2,0.7),A2(y)=(0,1).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,.(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A2,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = x, f(y) = y. Then f is generalized fuzzy(12,13)-semicontinuous. But f is not semi-generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous. For A2cA2c and A2c is fuzzy (12,13)-semiopen but scl (A2c,12,13)=1_A2c in ( ).

Theorem 5.4

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof

Straightforward.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 5.5

Let X = {x} and let A1, A2 and A3 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(0.1,0.8),A2(x)=(0.2,0.7),A3(x)=(0.7,0.2).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,A2(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A3,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping is defined by f(x) = x.

We consider only the non-trival fuzzy (12,13)-closed set A3c in ( ). For the only non-trivial fuzzy (12,13)-open superset A2 of A3c in ( ), we have scl (A3c,12,13)=A1cA2cA2=A2A2 . Thus, the inverse image f-1(A3c)=A3c is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-semiclosed in ( ). Hence, f is generalized fuzzy(12,13)-semi continuous.

We now consider the same fuzzy (12,13)-closedset A3c in ( ). For the fuzzy (12,13)-open superset A2 of A3c in ( ), cl (A3c,12,13)=A2cA2. Thus the inverse image f-1(A3c)=A3c is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ). Hence f is not generalized. fuzzy (12,13)-continuous.

Theorem 5.6

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous if and only if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiopen set in X for each fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Proof

It is obvious.

Theorem 5.7

Let be a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous mapping from aSoIFTS X to aSoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Thus, the following statements hold:

  • (1) f(gscl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set A in X.

  • (2) gscl(f1(B), r, s)) ⊆ f1(cl(B, r, s)) for each intuitionistic fuzzy set B in Y.

Proof

(1) Since cl(f(A), r, s) is fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y and f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, f1(cl(f(A), r, s)) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semiclosed. In addition, Af1(cl(f(A), r, s)), and hence gscl(A, r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(f(A), r, s)). Thus f(gscl(A, r, s)) ⊆ cl(f(A), r, s).

(2) Let BI(Y ), then f1(B) ∈ I(X). From (1), we have

f(sgcl(f-1(B),r,s))cl(f(f-1(B)),r,s)cl(B,r,s).

Hence gscl(f1(B), r, s) ⊆ f1(cl(B, r, s)).

Theorem 5.8

Let and be mapping, and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous and g is fuzzy (r, s)-continuous. Then, gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous.

Proof

It is obvious.

6. Generalized Fuzzy (r, s)-Irresolute Mappings

Definition 6.1

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Then, f is said to be generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute if f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X for each generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set B in Y.

Theorem 6.2

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. Subsequently, f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute if and only if f1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open in X for each generalized fuzzy (r, s)-open set B in Y.

Proof

It is obvious.

Theorem 6.3

Let be a mapping from a SoIFTS X to a SoIFTS Y and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute, then f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in Y. Then B is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in Y. Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute, f1(B) is a generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in X. Hence f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

The following example shows that the converse of the above theorem need not be true.

Example 6.4

Let X = {x, y, z} and A1, A2, and A3 be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X defined as

A1(x)=(1,0),A1(y)=(0,1),A1(z)=(0,1);A2(x)=(0,1),A2(y)=(0,1),A2(z)=(1,0);

and

A3(x)=(1,0),A3(y)=(0,1),A3(z)=(1,0).

Define and , by

T(A)=(T1(A),T2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,A2,A3,(0,1),otherwise;

and

U(A)=(U1(A),U2(A))={(1,0),if A=0_,1_,(12,13),if A=A1,(0,1),otherwise.

Then, and are SoIFTs on X. Consider a mapping defined by f(x) = x, f(y) = y, and f(z) = x. Clearly, f is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-continuous. However, f is not generalized fuzzy(12,13)-irresolute, because A3 is generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ) and f1(A3) = A3 is not generalized fuzzy (12,13)-closed in ( ).

Theorem 6.5

Let and be mappings and (r, s) ∈ II. If f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute and g is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, then gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

Proof

Let B be a fuzzy (r, s)-closed set in ( ). Since g is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, g1(B) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in ( ). Since f is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute, f1(g1(B)) is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-closed in ( ). Thus, gf is generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous.

7. Conclusion

We introduce four types of continuity, i.e., the concepts of generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, semi-generalized fuzzy (r, s)-continuous, generalized fuzzy (r, s)-semicontinuous, and generalized fuzzy (r, s)-irresolute mappings and investigated several of their properties. These continuities are either strong or weak versions of the traditional continuities. The relationships among these continuities were also discussed.

References

  1. Zadeh, LA (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8, 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    CrossRef
  2. Chang, CL (1968). Fuzzy topological spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 24, 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90057-7
    CrossRef
  3. Sostak, AP . On a fuzzy topological structure., Proceedings of the 13th Winter School on Abstract Analysis, 1985, Srni, Czech Republic, pp.89-103.
  4. Chattopadhyay, KC, Hazra, RN, and Samanta, SK (1992). Gradation of openness: fuzzy topology. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 49, 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90329-3
    CrossRef
  5. Ramadan, AA (1992). Smooth topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 48, 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90352-5
    CrossRef
  6. Atanassov, KT (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 20, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
    CrossRef
  7. Coker, D (1997). An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 88, 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00076-0
    CrossRef
  8. Coker, D, and Demirci, M (1996). An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense. Busefal. 67, 67-76.
  9. Kim, JT, and Lee, SJ (2022). Generalized fuzzy closed sets on intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society. 35, 243-254.
  10. Nevine, L (1970). Generalized closed sets in topology. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo. 19, 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02843888
    CrossRef
  11. Balasubramanian, G, and Sundaram, P (1997). On some generalizations of fuzzy continuous functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 86, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00371-1
    CrossRef
  12. El-Shafei, ME, and Zakari, A (2007). Semi-generalized continuous mappings in fuzzy topological spaces. Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society. 15, 109-120.
  13. Lee, EP (2004). Semiopen sets on intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces in Sostak’s sense. Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems. 14, 234-238.
    CrossRef
  14. Lee, SO, and Lee, EP (2005). Fuzzy (r, s)-preopen sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 5, 136-139.
    CrossRef
  15. Lee, EP, and Kim, SH (2007). Fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semicontinuous, fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semiopen and fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semiclosed mappings. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 7, 120-126.
    CrossRef
  16. Lee, SO, and Lee, EP (2006). Fuzzy strongly (r, s)-semiopen sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 6, 299-303.
    CrossRef
  17. Lee, SJ, and Kim, JT (2011). Properties of fuzzy (r, s)-semi-irresolute mappings in intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 11, 190-196. https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2011.11.3.190
    CrossRef